For the people behind compliance

Compliance tools that actually work under pressure.

Accountable workflows for regulatory reporting, risk methodology and customer risk assessment. Built to keep your team ready for audits, regulatory reviews and the next deadline.

Book a Demo
Have a question?Email us
  • ISO 27001 certified
  • Data processed in the EU
  • GDPR DPA

Two places lean teams lose control first.

Filing deadlines and methodology drift create different kinds of pressure. Each product focuses on one workflow and makes the work easier to run, review, and defend.

FATCA / CRS / DAC8

Regfiler

Fully managed regulatory filing. We handle XML generation, schema validation, and DIP submission as a Datensender, and deliver your official BZSt receipt.

  • BZSt DIP API-native submission
  • Nil and full report support
  • Official receipt delivered to you

Risk Methodology & Reg Monitoring

Coming soon

Justifier

Your risk methodology is generated directly from the live model. When a factor weight changes, the document updates itself. When a new BaFin circular drops, AI identifies which chapters are affected.

  • Zero drift between model and document
  • ML, TF, Sanctions tracks separately
  • Regulatory change monitoring

The tools you bought.
The reality on the ground.

What you bought

A single source of truth.

One connected compliance workspaceCore banking, risk engine, methodology document, FATCA/CRS records, UBO evidence, email approvals and regulatory changes are connected to risk ratings, methodology versions and filing evidence.

Risk ratings and methodology that stay aligned as regulations change. Customer and UBO evidence that supports the decision. FATCA/CRS records ready for filing.

What you’re left with

You’re still piecing it together.

Disconnected systems and documentsThe same seven sources sit apart: core banking, risk engine, methodology document, FATCA/CRS records, UBO evidence, email approvals and regulatory changes. Your team has to reconcile them by hand.

Reconciling risk-engine rules, Word documents and regulatory updates. Chasing UBO evidence and approvals. Rebuilding FATCA/CRS files from exports.

Less time rebuilding the story.More time protecting the institution.

When context, rationale, and evidence stay connected, compliance stops operating in scramble mode. Your team can see what changed, explain why it changed, and answer under pressure without reconstructing the work from scratch.

  1. The evidence behind the decision.

    Linked sources & materials

  2. The reasoning behind the change.

    Rationale & context

  3. The history behind the approval.

    Reviews, approvals & sign-offs

  4. The work affected by new obligations.

    Impacts & dependencies

The €60.7M of BaFin fines below trace to structural failure rather than bad intent.

The fines below appear to be about late filings, but the underlying cause is consistently structural. Risk ratings did not hold under scrutiny, triage and investigation ran slower than the filing deadline, and compliance was being run as overhead rather than as a product with domain focus and customer obsession. The same pattern is documented across BaFin, FCA, FinCEN, MAS, and FINMA enforcement in our whitepaper, and it is the gap our products are built to address.

  1. €45M

    J.P. Morgan SE

    BaFin's largest fine to date, issued for late STR filings between October 2021 and September 2022. The triage and investigation pipeline was running slower than the filing deadline.

  2. €9.2M

    N26 Bank

    Second BaFin fine after the 2021 action, with a growth cap and a special representative through end-2024. Compliance was being run as overhead, without the product management, customer obsession, and domain focus the work requires.

  3. €6.5M

    Solaris SE

    Late filings across a banking-as-a-service partner base, which led to the appointment of a special monitor. The risk ratings could not be trusted at the partner level.

Most compliance technology is built by people who have never had to use it under examination pressure. We have been on both sides.

We believe your technology should defend you during an audit, not be one more thing you have to defend.

Mohan Paranthaman

Mohan Paranthaman

Mohan on LinkedIn

Co-Founder · 20 years in AML, KYC, Fraud technology

In twenty years of AML, the test was never whether I could block risk. It was whether I could stay defensible to an examiner without turning away the customers the business exists to serve. Staying customer-centric and audit-ready at once: that is the balance.

That is why we stay close to the customer and the people who do the work. It is the only way to build a workflow that works in production and holds up under audit pressure.

Karthik Iyengar

Karthik Iyengar

Karthik on LinkedIn

Co-Founder · 15+ years in payments & compliance infrastructure

Handling billions in payments at scale taught me that security and correctness are not features; they are the foundation. We do not build black-box compliance tools. We build verifiable workflows where the decision, the evidence, and the audit trail stay connected.

That is the engineering discipline we were trained in. It is also what most compliance systems lack. We build ours the other way: auditable by design, from the day they go live.

Let's talk

Talk to the people building the product.

Bring your workflow and your questions; we'll help you understand the fit.